What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Structure?

· 3 min read
What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Structure?

If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a kilogram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can result in many potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

In the event that you've used mobile phone, you're probably aware that a safe distance from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the farther you are from it.

While  how to reduce wifi radiation at home  sounds like something that's good, the reality is that those living close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those living further distance from them.

This study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.

This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, which is the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin acts as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ in the human body, and is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds


The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).

The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effects on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such  how to block magnetic field  shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.