What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell Structure?

· 3 min read
What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell Structure?

If you've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research that prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This could lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.

Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever operated a cell phone, you probably know that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the farther your location from the tower.

While this sounds like something that's good, the reality is that those living close to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther distance from them.

However, this study also showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is utilized for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ in the human body. It is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).



The assumption is also ignoring the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effect of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.

Furthermore,  Proteck'd Apparel  and FCC are limiting their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly  Proteck'd Clothing  is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This could result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.